| 1 |
On 5/27/06, Alexander Skwar <listen@×××××××××××××××.name> wrote: |
| 2 |
> And also pardon me, when I'm annoyed because of too bold statements |
| 3 |
> which turn out to be wrong. If it says "no problems expected", then |
| 4 |
> that's what I expect. I don't expect to run into deep problems. And |
| 5 |
> the GWN and upgrade doc clearly stated, that there were no problems |
| 6 |
> to be expected. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
If you want to point out false and misleading statements, here is |
| 9 |
something you said earlier in this thread: |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> Of course. You don't need to have gcc installed to be able to |
| 12 |
run a *compiled* program. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
This is false. C++ programs are usually linked against libstdc++ that |
| 15 |
is in the gcc directory. So removing gcc will break these programs. |
| 16 |
Go head, try it. emerge -C gcc, and see how well your system works. |
| 17 |
(DANGER: for anybody else reading this, do *NOT* do this. You will |
| 18 |
likely break python, and thus portage, and then you are really |
| 19 |
screwed). |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Maybe *you* should do a little QA and testing before *you* give |
| 22 |
someone information that you believe to be true at the time. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-Richard |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives