| 1 |
Richard Fish wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 5/27/06, Alexander Skwar <listen@×××××××××××××××.name> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> And also pardon me, when I'm annoyed because of too bold statements |
| 4 |
>> which turn out to be wrong. If it says "no problems expected", then |
| 5 |
>> that's what I expect. I don't expect to run into deep problems. And |
| 6 |
>> the GWN and upgrade doc clearly stated, that there were no problems |
| 7 |
>> to be expected. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> If you want to point out false and misleading statements, here is |
| 10 |
> something you said earlier in this thread: |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
>> Of course. You don't need to have gcc installed to be able to |
| 13 |
> run a *compiled* program. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> This is false. C++ programs are usually linked against libstdc++ that |
| 16 |
> is in the gcc directory. So removing gcc will break these programs. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Yes, you're right. In the case of Gentoo, removing gcc will break |
| 19 |
systems. But, as you know, there are other distributions (like |
| 20 |
SuSE) where you can perfectly fine remove the compiler. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
> Maybe *you* should do a little QA and testing before *you* give |
| 23 |
> someone information that you believe to be true at the time. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Yes, I should've. What I wrote was wrong. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Alexander Skwar |
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Congratulations! You are the one-millionth user to log into our system. |
| 30 |
If there's anything special we can do for you, anything at all, don't |
| 31 |
hesitate to ask! |
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives