Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Grub1: Cant ? Re: keeping grub 1
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 12:49:43
Message-Id: CAJ0EP437-8dU=OceiTUQ26fv+mKTVBZL52WTf3C8v9o1ShoeiA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Grub1: Cant ? Re: keeping grub 1 by Michel Catudal
1 On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Michel Catudal <mcatudal@×××××××.net> wrote:
2 > Le 2015-08-26 13:37, Fernando Rodriguez a écrit :
3 >
4 >> This may not be complete and some of these may be possible to some extent
5 >> with
6 >> legacy grub:
7 >>
8 >> 1. Grub Legacy is 32-bit only, so you need 32-bit libraries or use grub-
9 >> static. Grub2 is portable, even beyond Intel architectures.
10 >> 2. Grub2 has been rewritten to be modular. Instead of Grub's stages model
11 >> it
12 >> uses a core image and a bunch of modules.
13 >> 3. EFI support without chainloading or other hacks.
14 >> 4. Better filesystem support. Including loopback devices.
15 >> 5. Graphics and theming support.
16 >> 6. Grub2's config file (the one it tells you not to edit manually) is
17 >> scriptable
18 >> using a shell-like script language.
19 >> 7. Password support for each entry.
20 >>
21 >>
22 >
23 > I've had serious problems in the past getting to to install on a partition
24 > and gave up. Is that bug fixed? It insists on installing on the MBR which is
25 > unacceptable.
26 >
27
28 It's not a bug, and it won't be "fixed". Installing on a partition is
29 simply not supported.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Grub1: Cant ? Re: keeping grub 1 Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk>
[gentoo-user] Re: Grub1: Cant ? Re: keeping grub 1 Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] Grub1: Cant ? Re: keeping grub 1 mcatudal@×××××××.net
Re: [gentoo-user] Grub1: Cant ? Re: keeping grub 1 Fernando Rodriguez <frodriguez.developer@×××××××.com>