1 |
Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 17 Sep 2011 13:27:45 -0700 |
3 |
> Mark Knecht<markknecht@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>>> Then I get confused. I get to Applications and I'm sort of lost |
6 |
>>> here. In there it talks about copying nano and its friends over to |
7 |
>>> the init directory. Then below that it says to use busybox. Well, |
8 |
>>> which is it? Do I do both of those or just one? |
9 |
>>> |
10 |
>> It's been a while for me but I believe it's both. I think busybox is |
11 |
>> the thing that gives you command line tools like cd, ls, pwd, etc. |
12 |
>> However you also can include applications in your initramfs that give |
13 |
>> you more access to the hardware or the net. |
14 |
> True. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Busybox is a tiny userland implementing most of the common options for |
17 |
> most of the common Unix commands. When you log into your ADSL |
18 |
> router/modem and get a shell, it's probably busybox running there, |
19 |
> not GNU util-linux stuff. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Binary distros often put busybox in their initrds as it doubles up as a |
22 |
> rescue environment and busybox is many times smaller than the full GNU |
23 |
> stuff. It's up to you if you want to do that or not; if all you use an |
24 |
> initrd for is a convenient place to store drivers to be able to |
25 |
> mount /usr, then you will have no need for busybox in it. |
26 |
> |
27 |
|
28 |
Unless something goes wrong. You know how I am. Murphy's law and all. |
29 |
lol |
30 |
|
31 |
Dale |
32 |
|
33 |
:-) :-) |