| 1 |
On 2009-02-06, Saphirus Sage <saphirus497@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>>>> Which begs the question, why not use HTML? It can be read on |
| 4 |
>>>> just about anything, searched and either split into chapters |
| 5 |
>>>> or presented as a single page. |
| 6 |
>>> |
| 7 |
>>> The cynic in me says that it's because Tim Berners-Lee |
| 8 |
>>> invented HTML, not Richard M Stallman. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> Info has been around a lot longer than HTML, but I think you're |
| 11 |
>> largely correct. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I'd wager to think that if we did use HTML, we'd simply argue |
| 14 |
> about the order of it's presentation or use of bold and |
| 15 |
> underlines. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
And let's not forget <blink>Flashing Text!</blink> (shudder). |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Grant Edwards grante Yow! ... I see TOILET |
| 21 |
at SEATS ... |
| 22 |
visi.com |
Archives