| 1 |
Grant Edwards wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 2009-02-06, Saphirus Sage <saphirus497@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>>>>> Which begs the question, why not use HTML? It can be read on |
| 6 |
>>>>> just about anything, searched and either split into chapters |
| 7 |
>>>>> or presented as a single page. |
| 8 |
>>>>> |
| 9 |
>>>> The cynic in me says that it's because Tim Berners-Lee |
| 10 |
>>>> invented HTML, not Richard M Stallman. |
| 11 |
>>>> |
| 12 |
>>> Info has been around a lot longer than HTML, but I think you're |
| 13 |
>>> largely correct. |
| 14 |
>>> |
| 15 |
>> I'd wager to think that if we did use HTML, we'd simply argue |
| 16 |
>> about the order of it's presentation or use of bold and |
| 17 |
>> underlines. |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> And let's not forget <blink>Flashing Text!</blink> (shudder). |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
Oh no, it's 1999's geocities all over again! Yeah, I'd rather not see |
| 24 |
man or info come to that...well, at least man. |
Archives