| 1 |
El 16/06/16 a las 13:32, Tom H escribió: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> When I first saw this, I thought "strange, maybe if Gentoo develops an |
| 5 |
> 'esnap' in order to build the container-package locally" but then I |
| 6 |
> remembered that we have docker and lxc/lxd, so why not another method? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
That is possible, but the goal is to serve Snap container for |
| 10 |
applications that can be downloaded and used by the user, down a single |
| 11 |
binary that will have all the dependencies in that binary. Docker and |
| 12 |
LXC obviously can do this, but its scope and possibilities are much |
| 13 |
larger and are not addressed within the scope of normal user of a PC. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> When Flatpak's ready, someone'll make it available and/or package it. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Flatpak is ready for use now. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> [AFAIK, Flatpak's for GUI apps accessed via Gnome Software so it's not |
| 22 |
> quite a Snap competitor.] |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Flatpak and Snap, have GUI and command-line. In addition, Flatpak |
| 26 |
packages weigh less than their counterparts Snap, and right now several |
| 27 |
free software projects officially support it, including LibreOffice. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Dios en su cielo, todo bien en la Tierra |
Archives