1 |
On 6/24/19 11:47 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
2 |
> Of course it is, a RAID1 device is just a block device on which you can |
3 |
> put any filesystem you like. RAID and LVM are complementary technologies |
4 |
> that work well together, but neither needs the others (apart from the |
5 |
> device-mapper bit). |
6 |
|
7 |
Eh. LVM can require RAID (multiple devices) without actually using MD |
8 |
outside of LVM. |
9 |
|
10 |
LVM can do RAID inside of LVM (I think this is fairly atypically done). |
11 |
But it does mean that you can turn physical disks (or better partitions) |
12 |
into Physical Volumes for LVM and then create different Logical Volumes |
13 |
with different RAID properties. |
14 |
|
15 |
I once had a LV w/ RAID 0 striping across multiple PVs with another LV |
16 |
with RAID 5 for redundancy, in the same PVs. |
17 |
|
18 |
This LVM functionality does require RAID (multiple device) support as |
19 |
that's what's used /inside/ (read: under the hood) of LVM. |
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Grant. . . . |
25 |
unix || die |