Archives
Archives
| From: | Allan Gottlieb <gottlieb@×××.edu> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] content of /usr/portage/distfile | ||
| Date: | Thu, 25 May 2006 00:32:51 | ||
| Message-Id: | yu9wtcbgdb4.fsf@nyu.edu | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] content of /usr/portage/distfile by Alex |
||
| 1 | At Wed, 24 May 2006 23:24:50 +0000 Alex <sohalt@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > Allan Gottlieb wrote: |
| 4 | >> Often the bigger problem with large binaries is that their working |
| 5 | >> sets exceeds the sizes of the L1 and (possibly) L2 caches. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > Well, I'm using -O3 and I have 1Mb L2, do you think I should "migrate" |
| 8 | > to -Os? |
| 9 | |
| 10 | You have to do experiments. It depends heavily on your application |
| 11 | mix. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | allan |
| 14 | -- |
| 15 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] content of /usr/portage/distfile | Alex <sohalt@×××××.com> |