| 1 |
Allan Gottlieb wrote: |
| 2 |
> Often the bigger problem with large binaries is that their working |
| 3 |
> sets exceeds the sizes of the L1 and (possibly) L2 caches. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Well, I'm using -O3 and I have 1Mb L2, do you think I should "migrate" |
| 6 |
to -Os? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Richard Fish wrote: |
| 9 |
> the real deciding factor was that it took a lot less |
| 10 |
> time to compile with -Os compared to -O3. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
The time I need to compile isn't my problem, and if it would, I think I |
| 13 |
could easy use -O0 ;) |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
BTW, is gcc 4.1 faster than 3.4? I've some benchmarks about gcc4, but |
| 16 |
not compared with 3.4. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Alex |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives