1 |
On Tuesday, 17 March 2020 04:42:12 GMT Dale wrote: |
2 |
> Matt Connell wrote: |
3 |
> > On 2020-03-16 19:46, Dale wrote: |
4 |
> >> Anything that can do, I can do locally by saving a web page or |
5 |
> >> downloading the content. |
6 |
|
7 |
Firefox has this functionality for people who have multiple devices and are |
8 |
not able or want to save content locally and want to discover similar |
9 |
articles/pages without carrying out their own web search manually and be able |
10 |
to access them from other devices too, potentially when offline. |
11 |
|
12 |
|
13 |
> > Pocket is easily replaced by just synchronizing bookmarks, for most |
14 |
> > people's purposes, and FF already supports that. |
15 |
|
16 |
Pocket, at least in its premium paid for service, is more than a bookmark |
17 |
syncronization service between devices alone. It is utilizing a 3rd party's |
18 |
cloud servers to store content and send this content to your devices, using a |
19 |
Firefox account. In addition, webpages uploaded to Pocket's servers are |
20 |
cleaned from adverts and extraneous content, can be tagged for easier |
21 |
referencing/search, have their text size adjusted for easier reading, etc. I |
22 |
don't know to what extent content is drawn dynamically from the original |
23 |
website and modified on the fly when a user logs in and requests it, or if it |
24 |
is stored on Pocket's servers and remains available even after the original |
25 |
website ceases to exist. |
26 |
|
27 |
Arguably Dale already does all most of this for himself, personally, locally |
28 |
and privately, without sharing *his* data with anyone else - unless he |
29 |
explicitly wishes to do so. Other users don't/can't and Pocket caters to |
30 |
their needs. |
31 |
|
32 |
Mozilla uses some anonymizing/obfuscating mechanism for storing your Firefox |
33 |
account and associated data on the cloud and Mozilla claim they don't share |
34 |
personally identifiable information with anyone else. |
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
> > If you need more than that, I can recommend Wallabag for link-saving. I |
38 |
> > use it as my "read later" list. |
39 |
> |
40 |
> Since I backup my /home directory, I have that already. Based on what |
41 |
> the link claims, it allows you to watch videos, read articles and such |
42 |
> later even if offline. If I like a page, I save it or print it as a pdf |
43 |
> or copy and paste it into LOo. It might be a long way around but it |
44 |
> makes it available even if the website removes content or shuts down |
45 |
> completely, forever. |
46 |
|
47 |
Yep, your data, under your ownership and free (as in freedom) access. |
48 |
|
49 |
|
50 |
> Still, I likely don't understand all it does but I disabled it since I |
51 |
> don't think it serves a purpose here for me anyway. Maybe others will. |
52 |
> |
53 |
> I wonder what else Firefox does I don't know about???? |
54 |
> |
55 |
> Dale |
56 |
> |
57 |
> :-) :-) |
58 |
|
59 |
In a proliferation of 'cloud services', 'user accounts', 'mobile apps', multi- |
60 |
device data access, etc. it is important to satisfy yourself a service |
61 |
provider's Business Model is not somehow orthogonal to your personal data |
62 |
security, privacy, rights and preferences. |
63 |
|
64 |
With Mozilla the picture is mixed. Mozilla Foundation is a not-for-profit |
65 |
organization established to lead the open source Mozilla project. All this is |
66 |
good I hear you say, but then comes Mozilla Corp. a subsidiary of Mozilla |
67 |
Foundation. The Mozilla Corp. outfit is for-profit, pays taxes and it |
68 |
reinvests all of its profits back into the Mozilla project. This was needed |
69 |
to overcome financial considerations a not-for-profit organization cannot |
70 |
engage with. Still good. Here comes the rub. Pocket contains closed source |
71 |
code and any statements about being converted into open source have yet to |
72 |
materialize. Also, the business model of surveillance capitalism is endemic |
73 |
in all business affiliates of Mozilla Corp. and the way they make money - with |
74 |
your data. So even if Mozilla Corp. is not using/abusing your private data, |
75 |
its affiliates are in business to do just that. |
76 |
|
77 |
I suggest the saying "if its free, your are the product" applies here too. |