1 |
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 04:04:38 +0100, walt <w41ter@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On 02/11/2010 01:35 PM, Zeerak Waseem wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> It just seems silly that if you want to use the newest version of kate, |
6 |
>> kmail etc. |
7 |
> > that semantic-desktop is forced upon you, when you're not interested |
8 |
> in having the |
9 |
> > entire DE. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> By the authority vested in me by My-Wife-the-Windows-User, I welcome you |
12 |
> to |
13 |
> the gentoo-users mail list. (I don't recall your name from previous |
14 |
> months, |
15 |
> but, nevermind.) |
16 |
> |
17 |
> I see that you've taken some heat in return for your opinions, but you've |
18 |
> maintained a very civil and polite tone to your replies, and I admire you |
19 |
> for that. |
20 |
> |
21 |
|
22 |
Why thank you :-) |
23 |
|
24 |
> On the other hand, may I politely suggest that, if you wish to use the |
25 |
> latest |
26 |
> version of kate (or any other software including software from M$) you |
27 |
> must |
28 |
> necessarily accept the decisions of the author of that software. How |
29 |
> could |
30 |
> it possibly be otherwise? |
31 |
> |
32 |
|
33 |
Well it can't be otherwise, however I do enjoy complaining, well about |
34 |
certain things anyway. Personally I installed kde, and realized I had no |
35 |
idea what on earth was on my computer and why, so I removed it and moved |
36 |
to openbox, and don't use any kde specific apps. |
37 |
But I do find it silly, that the various applications that aren't |
38 |
dependent of the DE, to require a dependency of the DE. It just seems a |
39 |
bit backwards to me :-) I simply don't understand. |
40 |
|
41 |
> The Ultimate Solution is to develop your own software, of course, and be |
42 |
> the next M$/Google/Whoever. |
43 |
> |
44 |
> Hey, I'm still working on it -- I'll get there, do-or-die! |
45 |
> |
46 |
> |
47 |
|
48 |
I just started a degree, to accomplish -something akin to- that ;-) |
49 |
|
50 |
|
51 |
-- |
52 |
Zeerak |