Archives
Archives
| From: | LK <linuxrocksrulers@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] grub vs grub 2 | ||
| Date: | Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:09:27 | ||
| Message-Id: | DD0B05D6-99AD-4CE5-8790-57DB4F0B80E7@gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] grub vs grub 2 by Florian Philipp |
||
| 1 | On 120214, at 18:53, Florian Philipp wrote: |
| 2 | > Am 14.02.2012 18:36, schrieb james: |
| 3 | >> Googling around, I get the impression |
| 4 | >> that 'grub' is now grub 2. Is that |
| 5 | >> correct? |
| 6 | >> [...] |
| 7 | > Because it is still in development hell, it has |
| 8 | > not reached version 2.00. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | BTW: So is grub0 still supported by gentoo / maintained by themselves? |
| 11 | Does that matter(it is boot, no network stuff) ? |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] grub vs grub 2 | "mike@×××××××.us" <mike@×××××××.us> |