1 |
Am 14.02.2012 18:36, schrieb james: |
2 |
> Googling around, I get the impression |
3 |
> that 'grub' is now grub 2. Is that |
4 |
> correct? |
5 |
> |
6 |
> In portage I see grub-static |
7 |
> (GRUB Legacy boot loader) |
8 |
> with version numbers that coincide with |
9 |
> "grub" (grub2 ?). |
10 |
> |
11 |
> If grub2 has replaced "grub-1" what (gentoo) |
12 |
> version number did grub2 first take take? |
13 |
> |
14 |
> What was the last (gentoo) version number for |
15 |
> grub 1 that was actually grub1 , or have I |
16 |
> confused these details? |
17 |
> |
18 |
> I cannot seem to find these details in the release |
19 |
> notes or as part of the sourcecode. Any suggestions |
20 |
> on that would be keen. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> James |
23 |
> |
24 |
> |
25 |
|
26 |
sys-boot/grub has two slots. The default slot 0 with version numbers |
27 |
around 0.92-0.97 is grub-1 (or grub legacy). Slot 2 with version numbers |
28 |
around 1.99 is grub-2. Because it is still in development hell, it has |
29 |
not reached version 2.00. |
30 |
|
31 |
IIRC, sys-boot/grub-static is mostly there for systems that cannot |
32 |
compile grub, for example AMD64 no-multilib profiles. |
33 |
|
34 |
Hope this helps, |
35 |
Florian Philipp |