| 1 |
Thanks - the drives are new from this year, so I don't think they'll fail any time soon. |
| 2 |
Considering that the WD60EFAX is advertised as "RAID compatible", what's for sure is that my next drives won't be WD. CMR *or* SMR... |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Feb 5, 2022, 18:04 by antlists@××××××××××××.uk: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> Ouch. EFAX drives are the new SMR version it seems. You might have been lucky, it might have added okay. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> The problem with these drives, basically, is you cannot stream data to them. They'll accept so much, fill up their CMR buffers, and then stall while they do an internal re-organisation. And by the time they start responding again, the OS thinks the drive has failed ... |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I've just bought a Toshiba N300 8TB for £165 as my backup drive. As far as I know that's an okay drive for raid - I haven't heard any bad stories about SMR being sneaked in ... I've basically split it in 2, 3TB as a spare partition for my raid, and 5TB as backup for my 6TB (3x3) raid array. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Look at creating a raid-10 from your WDs, or if you create a new raid-5 array from scratch using --assume-clean then format it, you're probably okay. Replacing SMRs with CMRs will probably work fine so if one of your WDs fail, you should be okay replacing it, so long as it's not another SMR :-) (If you do a scrub, expects loads of parity errors first time :-) but you will probably get away with it if you're careful. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Cheers, |
| 15 |
> Wol |
| 16 |
> |
Archives