Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Alan McKinnon <alan@××××××××××××××××.za>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Symlinking /usr/portage/distfiles
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 07:40:40
Message-Id: 200701290938.08476.alan@linuxholdings.co.za
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Symlinking /usr/portage/distfiles by Vlad Dogaru
1 On Saturday 27 January 2007 18:40, Vlad Dogaru wrote:
2 > One question though: is there a reason why PORTAGE_TMPDIR does not
3 > default to /tmp?
4
5 The real nature of /tmp isn't adequate for portage, that's why it uses a
6 different one. If memory serves, the FHS defines /tmp as a temporary
7 place to store files, and the continued existence of the file after a
8 process has finished is not guaranteed. In other words, if there are no
9 existing locks on a file, it's up for summary deletion. This could be
10 fatal in a big compile - imagine if some cleaner process nuked a binary
11 compiled 4 hours ago in an openoffice compile....
12
13 But the best reason is that some compiles are HUGE. Openoffice can take
14 up all of 5G with everything enabled, and as /tmp is often a tmpfs,
15 it's highly unlikely most users will have enough space on /tmp to
16 emerge it.
17
18 alan
19 --
20 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Symlinking /usr/portage/distfiles Albert Hopkins <marduk@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-user] Symlinking /usr/portage/distfiles "Bo Ørsted Andresen" <bo.andresen@××××.dk>