1 |
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 17:19, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On Monday 16 November 2009 21:26:02 Doug Hunley wrote: |
3 |
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 03:24, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |
4 |
> wrote: |
5 |
>> > Does anyone here successfully use amarok-2.2.0 with mysql-5.0.84-r1? |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> I haven't had any issues w/ amarok 2.2.0 and mysql 5.0.84-r1 (once I |
8 |
>> figured out how to get amarok to _not_ use the embedded mysql) |
9 |
> |
10 |
> That's a common complaint about amarok lately. The devs reckon they must use |
11 |
> multi-user mysql because it's almost impossible to get sqlite to do it |
12 |
> properly and totally impossible to get it to do it remotely. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> This puzzles me. How many users out their use their music player in multi-user |
15 |
> mode with a collection db on a remote machine? Apart from LTSP installs, I'll |
16 |
> bet it's none. And LTSP is better off using mpd, so why didn't the amarok devs |
17 |
> simply include mpd support? |
18 |
> |
19 |
> To answer your question, does Settings -> Collection -> enable check box & |
20 |
> fill in bottom half of dialog do what you want? |
21 |
|
22 |
I had done that actually, and it completely *ignored* it until I |
23 |
killed all amarok processes and removed the mysqle directory (I think |
24 |
that was the name). Thankfully, I found this solution on some random |
25 |
blog somewhere that google pointed me to |
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Douglas J Hunley, RHCT |
30 |
doug.hunley@×××××.com : http://douglasjhunley.com : Twitter: @hunleyd |
31 |
|
32 |
Obsessively opposed to the typical. |