| 1 |
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Bruce Hill |
| 2 |
<daddy@×××××××××××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 11:05:25AM -0600, Dale wrote: |
| 4 |
>> Bruce Hill wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> <<< SNIP >>> |
| 7 |
>> > No initrd... |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> YET!!! ROFL |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> When eudev goes stable, then we can disregard that yet. ;-) |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> Dale |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> devfs still works wonderfully ... for principle, if no other reason, that file |
| 16 |
> server will *NEVER* have an initrd image |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
You shouldn't need to wait for eudev. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Technically any early mount system configured and done _before_ udev |
| 21 |
should do the trick. I mean, it's not like udev is even *essential* |
| 22 |
for boot - that we happen to depend on it is just a matter of |
| 23 |
convenience. Shouldn't be hard to write an rc script that does just |
| 24 |
that for anyone that hates init thingies bad enough. Just hardcode an |
| 25 |
n-second sleep and plug in the kernel detected device name. Do rc |
| 26 |
scripts count as "init thingies"? :) |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
This email is: [ ] actionable [ ] fyi [x] social |
| 29 |
Response needed: [ ] yes [x] up to you [ ] no |
| 30 |
Time-sensitive: [ ] immediate [ ] soon [x] none |
Archives