Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] How and whether to take action on elog message from sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.73
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 18:03:41
Message-Id: 201008271959.26677.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] How and whether to take action on elog message from sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.73 by Kevin O'Gorman
1 Apparently, though unproven, at 18:55 on Friday 27 August 2010, Kevin O'Gorman
2 did opine thusly:
3
4 > I read the logs, but it doesn't always help. This one apparently used to
5 > build statically,
6 > and is now using shared libraries. Here's the message:
7 > =======================================================
8 > *Subject:* [portage] ebuild log for sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.73 on
9 > treat.kosmanor.com
10 >
11 > LOG: setup
12 > Warning, we no longer overwrite /sbin/lvm and /sbin/dmsetup with
13 > their static versions. If you need the static binaries,
14 > you must append .static the filename!
15 > =======================================================
16 > **
17 > It's not clear to me that I would need this package when dynamically
18 > loading is inactive,
19 > partly because I don't think that happens -- /usr/lib is not on a separate
20 > partition, so
21 > it's always there.
22 >
23 > Leaving that aside, the message does not state *which* filename to append
24 > ".static" to,
25 > and where to change it, so I'm baffled as to how to take action on this
26 > message, even
27 > if I thought it important to do.
28 >
29 > Anyone have a clue?
30
31
32 I should think it's quite obvious actually. The elog mentions /usr/lib
33 nowhere, it does mention /sbin. It also explicitly mentions two filenames:
34
35 /sbin/lvm
36 /sbin/dmsetup
37
38 then says that they are no longer overwritten with static versions. So,
39 presumably, /sbin/{lvm|dmsetup} exists (probably statically linked), and the
40 ebuild writes dynamically linked versions in their place. If you want static
41 versions, you must rename the two old files to lvm.static and dmsetup.static.
42
43 It is not a problem to have these binaries dynamically linked as
44
45 a. they are in /sbin and /lib which by convention are mandated to be on the
46 same partition as / and therefore always available,
47 b. /usr/ is referenced nowhere. Witness:
48
49 nazgul ~ # ldd /sbin/lvm
50 linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007ffffa3ff000)
51 libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x00007ff2c5aed000)
52 libdevmapper-event.so.1.02 => /lib/libdevmapper-event.so.1.02
53 (0x00007ff2c58e7000)
54 libdevmapper.so.1.02 => /lib/libdevmapper.so.1.02 (0x00007ff2c56c1000)
55 libreadline.so.6 => /lib/libreadline.so.6 (0x00007ff2c547c000)
56 libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x00007ff2c51f9000)
57 libudev.so.0 => /lib/libudev.so.0 (0x00007ff2c4feb000)
58 libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x00007ff2c4c74000)
59 /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007ff2c5cf1000)
60 libncurses.so.5 => /lib/libncurses.so.5 (0x00007ff2c4a23000)
61 nazgul ~ # ldd /sbin/dmsetup
62 linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff925ff000)
63 libdevmapper.so.1.02 => /lib/libdevmapper.so.1.02 (0x00007fb0e5a8d000)
64 libudev.so.0 => /lib/libudev.so.0 (0x00007fb0e587f000)
65 libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x00007fb0e5508000)
66 /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007fb0e5cb3000)
67
68 --
69 alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com