| 1 |
Hi Mick, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 11:21:23 +0100 |
| 4 |
Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
>So far I had been using gdbm, but I now see that emerge also added lmdb. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Same here, so I gave lmdb a try as hcache backend. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
>Which one is best to use? What have you chosen? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I assume you mean for speed? I don’t know and it may become very |
| 12 |
academic to answer this. But you can find some none Mutt-specific |
| 13 |
benchmark results on NeoMutt’s website [1]. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Note, the mentioned benchmark page say: |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
“[…] you’ll need a reasonable large number of |
| 18 |
messages – >50k – to see anything interesting” |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Using lmdb as backend, I do not realise any differences over gdbm within |
| 21 |
Mutt respectively NeoMutt and I doubt one really can (without measuring |
| 22 |
it exactly – which I haven’t done yet). |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
References: |
| 26 |
[1] <https://www.neomutt.org/contrib/hcache-bench> |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Regards, |
| 31 |
floyd |
Archives