| 1 |
On Saturday, April 16, 2016 12:47:14 PM Alan Grimes wrote: |
| 2 |
> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
| 3 |
> > you do stupid things and then complain that the system does not work. |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > Why don't you stop doing stupid things? |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > That said, C 1.0 blocks A 1.0 but updating to C 2.0 would solve it, does |
| 8 |
> > happen, even if you do not act retarded, BUT those instances are usually |
| 9 |
> > easy to solve. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> 1. I have self respect. I will not allow my computer to give me |
| 12 |
> busy-work like that. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
You will have to. As it's the only respect you'll get.... |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> 2. The error would be: |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> "ha ha ha you thought you could update C when A 1.0 is incompatible with |
| 19 |
> B 2.0 , you should RTFM you stoopeed nooob!" |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
How did you get portage to give those error messages? |
| 22 |
I'd love to get those... |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
> It is fundamentally broken. =| |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
So are your methods. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Joost |
Archives