Archives
Archives
| From: | "Hemmann | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Size of portage tree | ||
| Date: | Wed, 28 Sep 2005 22:55:08 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200509290050.51226.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Size of portage tree by Bryan Whitehead |
||
| 1 | On Thursday 29 September 2005 00:32, Bryan Whitehead wrote: |
| 2 | > > no, but I noticed, that reiserfs needs much less space with small files |
| 3 | > > (like portage tree) than ext2/3. |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > The only problem with this "solution" is you are then stuck using |
| 6 | > reiserfs... |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | > </fsflamewar> :D |
| 9 | |
| 10 | better than stuck with ext3 ;) |
| 11 | http://bugzilla.kernel.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=OPEN&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=product&type0-0-0=substring&value0-0-0=ext3&field0-0-1=component&type0-0-1=substring&value0-0-1=ext3&field0-0-2=short_desc&type0-0-2=substring&value0-0-2=ext3&field0-0-3=status_whiteboard&type0-0-3=substring&value0-0-3=ext3 |
| 12 | |
| 13 | they are ALL buggy - choose your poison ;) |
| 14 | |
| 15 | I have choosen reiser, because space is important for me - and I have a nice |
| 16 | tape-drive, which makes backup/restore very easy... but to be honest, I never |
| 17 | had reiserfs-bugs.. only hardware errors... |
| 18 | -- |
| 19 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Size of portage tree | Bryan Whitehead <driver@×××××××××.net> |