Archives
Archives
| From: | Bryan Whitehead <driver@×××××××××.net> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Size of portage tree | ||
| Date: | Wed, 28 Sep 2005 23:16:48 | ||
| Message-Id: | Pine.LNX.4.63.0509281608030.9026@beavis.megahappy.net | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Size of portage tree by "Hemmann | ||
| 1 | I've lost 5 filesystems on reiser... So I won't touch it anymore. :P :( |
| 2 | |
| 3 | I'm all XFS and so far have not many problems (with over 100 machines in |
| 4 | production). My favorite part about XFS is snapshotting and a working dump |
| 5 | command for mounted filesystems... |
| 6 | |
| 7 | On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: |
| 8 | |
| 9 | > On Thursday 29 September 2005 00:32, Bryan Whitehead wrote: |
| 10 | >>> no, but I noticed, that reiserfs needs much less space with small files |
| 11 | >>> (like portage tree) than ext2/3. |
| 12 | >> |
| 13 | >> The only problem with this "solution" is you are then stuck using |
| 14 | >> reiserfs... |
| 15 | >> |
| 16 | >> </fsflamewar> :D |
| 17 | > |
| 18 | > better than stuck with ext3 ;) |
| 19 | > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=OPEN&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=product&type0-0-0=substring&value0-0-0=ext3&field0-0-1=component&type0-0-1=substring&value0-0-1=ext3&field0-0-2=short_desc&type0-0-2=substring&value0-0-2=ext3&field0-0-3=status_whiteboard&type0-0-3=substring&value0-0-3=ext3 |
| 20 | > |
| 21 | > they are ALL buggy - choose your poison ;) |
| 22 | > |
| 23 | > I have choosen reiser, because space is important for me - and I have a nice |
| 24 | > tape-drive, which makes backup/restore very easy... but to be honest, I never |
| 25 | > had reiserfs-bugs.. only hardware errors... |
| 26 | > |
| 27 | |
| 28 | -- |
| 29 | Bryan Whitehead |
| 30 | Email:driver@×××××××××.net |
| 31 | -- |
| 32 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |