| 1 |
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Mark David Dumlao <madumlao@×××××.com> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 2:58 AM, Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@×××××.com> |
| 7 |
> wrote: |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
>> On 2014-09-20, Mark David Dumlao <madumlao@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> >> The only Linux systems where I care about boot time are embedded |
| 12 |
>> >> systems which are never going to have the resources needed to run |
| 13 |
>> >> systemd. |
| 14 |
>> > |
| 15 |
>> > You are mistaken. |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> No, I am not. |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> > I've helped a friend debug problems on a couple devices running a |
| 20 |
>> > custom Arch system with systemd. |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
>> How does that contradict the statement I made that the systems where I |
| 23 |
>> care about boot times do not have the resources required to run |
| 24 |
>> systemd? |
| 25 |
>> |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> You made a generic, catch-all statement about embedded systems which isnt |
| 28 |
> necessarily true. There are plenty of routers or NAS devices or ipcams, etc |
| 29 |
> that have the resources to run systemd. Pretty much everything that has the |
| 30 |
> space to fit the kernel and a a few MB has the resources to run it |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Sorry I clicked somewhere onscreen and it sent immediately. An audit of 204 |
| 34 |
on debian shows that it's small to negligible, with a lot of optional |
| 35 |
components. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
https://people.debian.org/~stapelberg/docs/systemd-dependencies.html |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
> |
| 43 |
> -- |
| 44 |
> This email is: [ ] actionable [ ] fyi [ ] social |
| 45 |
> Response needed: [ ] yes [ ] up to you [ ] no |
| 46 |
> Time-sensitive: [ ] immediate [ ] soon [ ] none |
| 47 |
> |
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
-- |
| 52 |
This email is: [ ] actionable [ ] fyi [ ] social |
| 53 |
Response needed: [ ] yes [ ] up to you [ ] no |
| 54 |
Time-sensitive: [ ] immediate [ ] soon [ ] none |
Archives