| 1 |
>>>> I was thinking about this. The digital HDMI signal must be converted |
| 2 |
>>>> into an analog signal at some point if it's being represented as light |
| 3 |
>>>> on a TV screen. Electrical interference generated by the computer and |
| 4 |
>>>> traveling up the HDMI wire should have its chance to affect things |
| 5 |
>>>> (i.e. create weird shadows) at that point, right? |
| 6 |
>>> |
| 7 |
>>> Not with DFPs. Those work digital even internally. I assume of course that |
| 8 |
>>> his HDMI TV *is* a DFP. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> But at some point the 1s and 0s must be converted to some sort of an |
| 11 |
>> analog signal if only right behind the diode. A diode must be |
| 12 |
>> presented with a signal in some sort of analog form in order to |
| 13 |
>> illuminate, right? Digital is just a figment of our imagination after |
| 14 |
>> all. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Sure, but that couldn't introduce ghosting as shown in the picture. |
| 17 |
> Ghosting represents the image being offset in its intended raster |
| 18 |
> coordinates. By the time a diode is turned on or off, the decision if |
| 19 |
> which diode a signal goes to has already been made. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
True, but *is* that D/A conversion made right behind each diode? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
- Grant |
Archives