1 |
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Grant <emailgrant@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
>>> I was thinking about this. The digital HDMI signal must be converted |
3 |
>>> into an analog signal at some point if it's being represented as light |
4 |
>>> on a TV screen. Electrical interference generated by the computer and |
5 |
>>> traveling up the HDMI wire should have its chance to affect things |
6 |
>>> (i.e. create weird shadows) at that point, right? |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> Not with DFPs. Those work digital even internally. I assume of course that |
9 |
>> his HDMI TV *is* a DFP. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> But at some point the 1s and 0s must be converted to some sort of an |
12 |
> analog signal if only right behind the diode. A diode must be |
13 |
> presented with a signal in some sort of analog form in order to |
14 |
> illuminate, right? Digital is just a figment of our imagination after |
15 |
> all. |
16 |
|
17 |
Sure, but that couldn't introduce ghosting as shown in the picture. |
18 |
Ghosting represents the image being offset in its intended raster |
19 |
coordinates. By the time a diode is turned on or off, the decision if |
20 |
which diode a signal goes to has already been made. |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
:wq |