| 1 |
Nick Rout wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>To everyone in this thread: it would probably help if you specified |
| 4 |
>which version of portage you are running! |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
>On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:34:00 +0100 |
| 8 |
>Jarry wrote: |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
Still running portage 2.0.51.22-r3 here, which is why the speed |
| 13 |
variation was puzzling. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I now think the variation (with this version of portage) simply reflects |
| 16 |
whether the "emerge sync" changed anything or not. If nothing changed, |
| 17 |
the cache rebuild is quick. If something changed, the rebuild is slow and |
| 18 |
hangs around for a long time at 51% or 52%. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
John Green |
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives