| 1 |
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 06:36:15 +0100, Mick wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Also worth mentioning is dcfldd which unlike dd can show progress of |
| 4 |
> the bit stream and also produce hashes of the transferred output. It |
| 5 |
> has the same performance as the dd command though. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I can't find the reference right now, but I did read that dcfldd |
| 8 |
determines the best block size on the fly if none is given. It's |
| 9 |
certainly faster than dd when copying images to USB frives (my main use |
| 10 |
for it) when given no block size. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
There is absolutely no substitute for a genuine lack of preparation. |
Archives