1 |
Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> [16-03-30 17:12]: |
2 |
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 06:36:15 +0100, Mick wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > Also worth mentioning is dcfldd which unlike dd can show progress of |
5 |
> > the bit stream and also produce hashes of the transferred output. It |
6 |
> > has the same performance as the dd command though. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> I can't find the reference right now, but I did read that dcfldd |
9 |
> determines the best block size on the fly if none is given. It's |
10 |
> certainly faster than dd when copying images to USB frives (my main use |
11 |
> for it) when given no block size. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> |
14 |
> -- |
15 |
> Neil Bothwick |
16 |
> |
17 |
> There is absolutely no substitute for a genuine lack of preparation. |
18 |
|
19 |
Sounds it will be the tool of choice for that purpose, Neil ! :) |
20 |
|
21 |
Best regards, |
22 |
Meino |