| 1 |
* Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk> [160811 01:29]: |
| 2 |
> On Wednesday 10 Aug 2016 15:21:54 Philip Webb wrote: |
| 3 |
> > 160810 Peter Humphrey wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > I've been using KMail for many years. It suits me in many ways, |
| 5 |
> > > the most important being that I don't need to keep switching my hands |
| 6 |
> > > between mouse and keyboard. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > If that's your criterion, why not try Mutt ? |
| 9 |
> > I've been using it for c 20 years & have never wanted anything else. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> How does it display HTML in messages? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> -- |
| 14 |
> Rgds |
| 15 |
> Peter |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I use Mutt (and have for a long long time.) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
You can configure what to use to display HTML. I have it going to links |
| 20 |
or elinks or similar (I forget exactly which one.) However, in most |
| 21 |
cases I prefer not to look at HTML email at all and generally delete any |
| 22 |
email with only HTML and no plaintext part. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Todd |
Archives