| 1 |
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 22:42 +0100, Zsitvai János wrote: |
| 2 |
> "b.n." <brullonulla@×××××.com> writes: |
| 3 |
> > I'd like to try Paludis, looks very promising. |
| 4 |
> > I think I've read that Portage and Paludis can coexist happily. Can |
| 5 |
> > someone confirm it? It would be useful for a transition. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> It works just fine. :) Later versions have the ability to use portage |
| 8 |
> configuration files directly, but that makes you lose some advantages, |
| 9 |
> like per-repository masking or unmasking of packages. I use a small |
| 10 |
> script to keep portage and paludis config files in sync, so I can use |
| 11 |
> whichever I want. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> The thing I like about it most is how it keeps overlays separate, so |
| 14 |
> they don't override eclasses globally, or that you can even specify |
| 15 |
> 'underlays' that are only used if neither the official portage nor any |
| 16 |
> other overlays carry a specific package. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> And the recent addition of the option '--continue-on-failure' won me |
| 19 |
> over all over again. :) |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> János Zsitvai |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
May i have that script? I assume it's GPLed :-) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives