1 |
"b.n." <brullonulla@×××××.com> writes: |
2 |
> I'd like to try Paludis, looks very promising. |
3 |
> I think I've read that Portage and Paludis can coexist happily. Can |
4 |
> someone confirm it? It would be useful for a transition. |
5 |
|
6 |
It works just fine. :) Later versions have the ability to use portage |
7 |
configuration files directly, but that makes you lose some advantages, |
8 |
like per-repository masking or unmasking of packages. I use a small |
9 |
script to keep portage and paludis config files in sync, so I can use |
10 |
whichever I want. |
11 |
|
12 |
The thing I like about it most is how it keeps overlays separate, so |
13 |
they don't override eclasses globally, or that you can even specify |
14 |
'underlays' that are only used if neither the official portage nor any |
15 |
other overlays carry a specific package. |
16 |
|
17 |
And the recent addition of the option '--continue-on-failure' won me |
18 |
over all over again. :) |
19 |
|
20 |
János Zsitvai |
21 |
-- |
22 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |