1 |
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 22:42 +0100, Zsitvai János wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> And the recent addition of the option '--continue-on-failure' won me |
4 |
> over all over again. :) |
5 |
|
6 |
I've been wondering for a long time why portage doesn't continue with |
7 |
building other packages when one fails - so long as deps are met why |
8 |
stop? |
9 |
|
10 |
Acutally, while I'm on the subject of features - here's another one I'd |
11 |
like to see: parallel merges instead of parallel makes. Since many |
12 |
packages have problems with MAKEOPTS, it doesn't help with configure |
13 |
scripts anyway and other parts of the process, why not spawn 2 or 3 |
14 |
emerges automatically? Each one could do it's own "tree" of packages |
15 |
and dependencies that don't affect the other... would be nice IMHO. |
16 |
|
17 |
cya, |
18 |
-- |
19 |
Iain Buchanan <iaindb at netspace dot net dot au> |
20 |
|
21 |
People think love is an emotion. Love is good sense. |
22 |
-- Ken Kesey |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |