| 1 |
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés <caneko@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Dan Johansson <Dan.Johansson@×××.nu> wrote: |
| 3 |
>>> > This is definitely not a choice that the gentoo disto made; it is coming |
| 4 |
>>> > from several upstreams. |
| 5 |
>>> |
| 6 |
>>> I know it is from upstream but it still tastes really bad. ;-) |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> I can only agree! |
| 9 |
>> I am having /usr on a LVM volume on all systems (Gentoo and non Gentoo). |
| 10 |
>> This will be a MAJOR issue if /usr needs to be on /. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> It is my understanding that /usr does *not* need to be on /, only that |
| 13 |
> if you do, you will need an initramfs. Look at |
| 14 |
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/72275 and the thread |
| 15 |
> that followed it. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
...and now I know that my entirely UUID-driven fstab may stop working, |
| 18 |
if they choose not to add that particular "tweak/improvement". |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
:wq |
Archives