1 |
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés <caneko@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
>> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Dan Johansson <Dan.Johansson@×××.nu> wrote: |
4 |
>>>> > This is definitely not a choice that the gentoo disto made; it is coming |
5 |
>>>> > from several upstreams. |
6 |
>>>> |
7 |
>>>> I know it is from upstream but it still tastes really bad. ;-) |
8 |
>>> |
9 |
>>> I can only agree! |
10 |
>>> I am having /usr on a LVM volume on all systems (Gentoo and non Gentoo). |
11 |
>>> This will be a MAJOR issue if /usr needs to be on /. |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>> It is my understanding that /usr does *not* need to be on /, only that |
14 |
>> if you do, you will need an initramfs. Look at |
15 |
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/72275 and the thread |
16 |
>> that followed it. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> ...and now I know that my entirely UUID-driven fstab may stop working, |
19 |
> if they choose not to add that particular "tweak/improvement". |
20 |
|
21 |
...or you could, you know, use the genkernel generated initramfs, or |
22 |
dracut. Anyway, probably UUIDs and labels will be added to the minimal |
23 |
initramfs (it is my undrestanding it's kinda easy to do). The |
24 |
important thing is that it will be still supported. |
25 |
|
26 |
Regards. |
27 |
-- |
28 |
Canek Peláez Valdés |
29 |
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación |
30 |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México |