| 1 |
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 22:08:24 +0100 |
| 2 |
Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 20:48:10 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > syslinux/extlinux and friends are more suited for embedded devices, |
| 7 |
> > liveCDs and that sort of thing. They never found much traction for |
| 8 |
> > desktop use which explains why the Handbook makes no real effort to |
| 9 |
> > document them. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> One of the main strengths of {sys,iso,ext}linux is in demonstrating |
| 12 |
> how simple and well-documented GRUB is by comparison. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
That has *got* to be the first time ever someone could validly call |
| 16 |
grub "simple" and "well-documented" |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Usually, grub is anything but :-) |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Alan McKinnnon |
| 23 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
Archives