Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Beta test Gentoo with mdev instead of udev; version 3
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 02:17:51
Message-Id: CAA2qdGUSQX3iuMfevMaqWH-=63VQi=vcyO=kF66DPKUho-qD6A@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Beta test Gentoo with mdev instead of udev; version 3 by Dale
1 On Jan 6, 2012 8:50 AM, "Dale" <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote:
2 >
3 > Alan McKinnon wrote:
4 >>
5 >> I see that as a liability not a feature. Our routers have very clear
6 naming conventions for interfaces and they are exactly how Cisco enumerates
7 them and no other way. It's a firing offense to dick with them and dream up
8 useless "descriptive names". Mind you, these for the most part are big iron
9 with several 1000 interfaces each and 100+ support personnel working on
10 them. But even the on-site routers and firewalls at customer premises have
11 the same rule. I assume we are talking about kit that routes properly
12 (whether a Unix or something else is not relevant) and not some joke
13 system. As for NICs that do not come up at boot time in a consistent order,
14 if any piece of hardware in our DC did that it would be sent right back to
15 the vendor labeled as a piece of shit with a demand for a refund. FFS, if
16 my boss shells out 3 months wages for some iron and it can't even get
17 something that basic correct, I start to wonder what else might be dodgy.
18 There is ZERO excuse for a system that cannot deterministically enumerate
19 it's fixed devices at boot time.
20 >
21 >
22 > I have a couple desktop rigs. I had a card that would sometimes not do
23 right and change the order of my cards numbering. Since it was earlier
24 than the card that hooked to my modem, it would mess up my connection to
25 the internet. The card was eth0 and I had internet coming through on eth2.
26 That rig now has two nics. The defective nic was removed. It has a new
27 address called /dev/dump.
28 >
29 > It may be a desktop rig but I like them being recognized the same each
30 time I reboot. Although, I forgot about being able to give them names. <
31 scratches chin > Nah, I'll leave well enough alone. It's working and we
32 don't mess with what is working, except for Fedora devs. lol
33 >
34
35 mdev is capable of renaming devices, you know ;-)
36
37 https://svn.mcs.anl.gov/repos/ZeptoOS/trunk/BGP/packages/busybox/src/docs/mdev.txt
38
39 Rgds,

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Beta test Gentoo with mdev instead of udev; version 3 Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>