| 1 |
pk wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 2013-08-18 23:08, Mick wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> I honestly cannot understand why we/Gentoo are allowing the RHL |
| 5 |
>> monolithic development philosophy to break what we have. Is |
| 6 |
>> Poettering the only developer available to the Linux world? Are |
| 7 |
>> RHL dictating what path Debian and its cousin distros should |
| 8 |
>> follow? |
| 9 |
> Problem is that Linux is dependent on udev and udev is in the hands of |
| 10 |
> Kay Sievers which also develops systemd together with Lennart |
| 11 |
> Poettering which in turn used to be a Gnome developer... With that |
| 12 |
> said, what I cannot understand is why people advocating systemd (and |
| 13 |
> the kitchen-and-sink model) are using Gentoo in the first place. Are |
| 14 |
> they just trying to make the rest of the Linux distro landscape as |
| 15 |
> miserable as Fedora? Why don't they stay with Fedora instead of trying |
| 16 |
> to turn Gentoo into Fedora? |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Best regards |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Peter K |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Picking random message sort of. Isn't eudev still going to support a |
| 26 |
separate /usr? That is my understanding. If eudev is not then I may |
| 27 |
have to reconsider some things myself here. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Dale |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
:-) :-) |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |
Archives