| 1 |
On 2013-08-19 00:49, Dale wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Picking random message sort of. Isn't eudev still going to support a |
| 4 |
> separate /usr? That is my understanding. If eudev is not then I may |
| 5 |
> have to reconsider some things myself here. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Yes, that is my understanding as well. But the "decision" to not support |
| 8 |
a separate /usr lies higher up in the system hierarchy (as I understand |
| 9 |
it). Gentoo as a system will not support a separate /usr if we are to |
| 10 |
believe the conversation (I haven't seen any official notice of this |
| 11 |
though). That is the sad part. The problem I have, as an engineer, is |
| 12 |
that "everybody" says that a separate /usr is broken, that sysvinit is |
| 13 |
broken without explaining why. In order to fix a problem you need to |
| 14 |
know what is broken... The people who claims the brokenness are, imo, |
| 15 |
hand waving and they've managed to convince higher uppers in the Gentoo |
| 16 |
infrastructure (as it seems). I guess if you repeat something often |
| 17 |
enough it becomes a "truth" or said person(s) just agrees to stop the |
| 18 |
nagging. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Best regards |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Peter K |
Archives