1 |
On 19 August 2013, at 10:31, pk wrote: |
2 |
> ... The problem I have, as an engineer, is |
3 |
> that "everybody" says that a separate /usr is broken, that sysvinit is |
4 |
> broken without explaining why. In order to fix a problem you need to |
5 |
> know what is broken... |
6 |
|
7 |
Here's a short, very in-comprehensive list of software we are aware of that |
8 |
currently are not able to provide the full set of functionality when /usr |
9 |
is split off and not pre-mounted at boot: udev-pci-db/udev-usb-db and all |
10 |
rules depending on this (using the PCI/USB database in /usr/share), |
11 |
PulseAudio, NetworkManager, ModemManager, udisks, libatasmart, |
12 |
usb_modeswitch, gnome-color-manager, usbmuxd, ALSA, D-Bus, CUPS, Plymouth, |
13 |
LVM, hplip, multipath, Argyll, VMWare, the locale logic of most programs |
14 |
and a lot of other stuff. [1] |
15 |
|
16 |
I honestly don't have a horse in this race, I don't much care one way or the other. |
17 |
|
18 |
I tend to like things "the old fashioned way", I like things simple, and I like to keep doing things the way I know. |
19 |
|
20 |
I hate the whole initrd thing, but I tend to slap most everything on a single partition, anyway. |
21 |
|
22 |
I could be persuaded either way, were there compelling arguments, but you just undermine your own position by pretending that the reasons for the migration are somehow fictional. |
23 |
|
24 |
Stroller. |
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
[1] http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken/ |