1 |
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 07:10:07PM -0800, Dan Cowsill wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 06:53:18 -0800, Dan Cowsill wrote: |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > > Running rc or rc default returns immediately. I am sure I am starting |
7 |
> > > into the default runlevel because ntp-client runs on default and it |
8 |
> > > starts no problem. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > Have you enabled logging in rc.conf? What does /var/log/rc.log show? |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> I have indeed. The logs show that everything but xdm and |
14 |
> virtualbox-guest-additions start normally. The logs do not show any |
15 |
> attempt to start either of those. It seems this system is full of lies. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Did you check the file permissions on those scripts? |
18 |
> |
19 |
> |
20 |
> I have. Permissions in the /etc/init.d folder are consistent across the |
21 |
> board. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> If anything else, you can try running 'strace -e trace=file' on |
24 |
> > rc-status and rc-update show and might notice something there that would |
25 |
> > explain while those two tools come up with different sets of scripts... |
26 |
> |
27 |
> |
28 |
> I've attached the strace results from rc-status, rc-update show and rc |
29 |
> itself. If you guys can make any sense of them, I'd be grateful. |
30 |
|
31 |
Seems that rc-status sees the xdm initscript... but why doesn't it |
32 |
show it then... no idea... |
33 |
|
34 |
My advice would be to submit a bug, the inconsistent output from |
35 |
rc-status vs rc-update is suspicious enough... |
36 |
|
37 |
You might also try to re-emerge the packages that installs |
38 |
/etc/init.d/xdm to see if that doesn't help... (should be |
39 |
x11-base/xorg-server) |
40 |
|
41 |
yoyo |