Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Alan McKinnon <alan@××××××××××××××××.za>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Wha' hoppen to firestarter?
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 08:10:46
Message-Id: 200706061007.59430.alan@linuxholdings.co.za
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Wha' hoppen to firestarter? by Kevin O'Gorman
1 On Wednesday 06 June 2007, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
2 > I had firestarter-1.0.3 emerged for quite some time. I hadn't really
3 > used it, but I'm a bit surprised now to find that it's interfering
4 > with normal emerges because it's got a big red "M" smacked on it.
5 >
6 > I suppose that means there's a problem with it, and it's explained in
7 > some forum or list that I don't normally get. But now I'd like a
8 > clue: what's the {prognosis, workaround, fix, alternative}. As I
9 > mentioned, I hadn't really started to use it, but I'd like to have a
10 > better firewall tool than building iptables scripts in vim.
11
12 I find it useful to read the new entries in
13 $PORTDIR/profile/package.mask after every sync to see what's recently
14 been nuked:
15
16 # Michael Sterrett <mr_bones_@g.o> (30 May 2007)
17 # masked for removal on 20070629
18 # Upstream is dead and there are several open bugs:
19 # http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146620
20 # http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=179792
21 # http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=180104
22 # http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=180105
23 # See
24 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.firestarter.user/1342
25 # for a thread on the mailing list regarding the state of things,
26 including
27 # mention of the problems with the newest netfilter code.
28 net-firewall/firestarter
29
30
31 alan
32
33
34 --
35 Optimists say the glass is half full,
36 Pessimists say the glass is half empty,
37 Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be?
38
39 Alan McKinnon
40 alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za
41 +27 82, double three seven, one nine three five
42 --
43 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list