Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation?
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 13:55:45
Message-Id: 200609171448.15022.michaelkintzios@gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation? by Alexander Skwar
1 On Sunday 17 September 2006 13:43, Alexander Skwar wrote:
2 > · Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>:
3 > > On Sunday 17 September 2006 09:21, Neil Bothwick wrote:
4 > >> On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 07:50:28 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
5 > >> > > It makes very little sense to ditch the unix norm of setting a
6 > >> > > systemwide domain name in favor of doing it per interface!
7 > >> >
8 > >> > True. And that's probably why you don't *have* to set it per
9 > >> > interface.
10 > >>
11 > >> Exactly, the current system gives the choice of setting it globally or
12 > >> per-interface in the same file.
13 > >
14 > > Can you please guide me how to set it up globally?
15 >
16 > It's all in /etc/conf.d/net.example.
17 >
18 > > I am not sure I can follow
19 > > the otherwise well commented /etc/conf.d/net.
20 >
21 > What problems do you have specifically?
22 > What did you try?
23 > What was the expected outcome and what did you get in reality?
24
25 I saw this: # dns_domain_eth0="your.domain" in the /etc/conf.d/net.example and
26 added: dns_domain="STUDY"
27
28 but still .none comes up:
29
30 # domainname
31 (none)
32
33 --
34 Regards,
35 Mick

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation? Kevin O'Gorman <kogorman@×××××.com>
RE: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation? "Timothy A. Holmes" <tholmes@×××××××××.net>
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation? Ryan Tandy <tarpman@×××××.com>