Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Alexander Skwar <listen@×××××××××××××××.name>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation?
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 12:53:46
Message-Id: 2507747.DxjkuuyZWt@m-id.message-center.info
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation? by Mick
1 · Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>:
2
3 > On Sunday 17 September 2006 09:21, Neil Bothwick wrote:
4 >> On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 07:50:28 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
5 >> > > It makes very little sense to ditch the unix norm of setting a
6 >> > > systemwide domain name in favor of doing it per interface!
7 >> >
8 >> > True. And that's probably why you don't *have* to set it per interface.
9 >>
10 >> Exactly, the current system gives the choice of setting it globally or
11 >> per-interface in the same file.
12 >
13 > Can you please guide me how to set it up globally?
14
15 It's all in /etc/conf.d/net.example.
16
17 > I am not sure I can follow
18 > the otherwise well commented /etc/conf.d/net.
19
20 What problems do you have specifically?
21 What did you try?
22 What was the expected outcome and what did you get in reality?
23
24 Alexander Skwar
25 --
26 BOFH Excuse #205:
27
28 Quantum dynamics are affecting the transistors
29
30
31 --
32 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation? Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>