Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation?
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 11:50:40
Message-Id: 200609171245.58695.michaelkintzios@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation? by Neil Bothwick
1 On Sunday 17 September 2006 09:21, Neil Bothwick wrote:
2 > On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 07:50:28 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
3 > > > It makes very little sense to ditch the unix norm of setting a
4 > > > systemwide domain name in favor of doing it per interface!
5 > >
6 > > True. And that's probably why you don't *have* to set it per interface.
7 >
8 > Exactly, the current system gives the choice of setting it globally or
9 > per-interface in the same file.
10
11 Can you please guide me how to set it up globally? I am not sure I can follow
12 the otherwise well commented /etc/conf.d/net. My hardware router/modem acts
13 as the dns server for the LAN and I used to be able to setup a domainname
14 STUDY for my LAN.
15 --
16 Regards,
17 Mick

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-user] Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation? Alexander Skwar <listen@×××××××××××××××.name>