| 1 |
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 08:48:45 +0100 |
| 2 |
Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Hello David Relson, |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > > Because it is hard-masked in package.mask ;-) If you really want |
| 7 |
> > > it you can unmask it in /etc/portage/package.unmask |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> > At present, /etc/portage only has package.keywords. As |
| 10 |
> > package.mask is not present, it's not hard masked. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> It is masked in /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> > Unmasking it in package.unmask does the trick. I guess I had |
| 15 |
> > package.keywords and package.unmask confused. 'Tis time to re-read |
| 16 |
> > the man pages. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> No, the two are different. package.unmask is used to override the |
| 19 |
> profile package.mask. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Incidentally, 2.10.0 is out now, but not yet in portage. Instead of |
| 22 |
> installing the rc, copy /usr/portage/mail-client/claws-mail to your |
| 23 |
> overlay and rename the ebuild to claws-mail-2.10.0.ebuild. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
With the addition of "emerge .../claws-mail-2.10.0.ebuild digest", I've |
| 26 |
got the 2.10.0 build running ... |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Thanks for the suggestion Neil. |
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives