1 |
On Oct 23, 2011 6:59 AM, "Dale" <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> Grant wrote: |
4 |
>>> |
5 |
>>> Cheapest laser you can find at Office Depot tends to be a Brother. I've |
6 |
got |
7 |
>>> two...an HL-2040 and an HL-2140. Both work perfectly with CUPS. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> +1. Every Brother laser printer I've tried works perfectly. I don't |
10 |
>> even bother with linuxprinting.org any more. When I wear one laser |
11 |
>> printer out, I just buy the latest Brother. |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>> - Grant |
14 |
>> |
15 |
>> |
16 |
> |
17 |
> I used to work for a computer place and we sold and serviced Brother |
18 |
stuff. They were well made back then. I haven't used one in a long while |
19 |
but it sounds like they still make good stuff. I always liked that they had |
20 |
metal gears and stuff when everyone else had went to plastic. Epsons were |
21 |
good at going with plastic, even on their higher end stuff. They would |
22 |
strip out regular too. Get a good paper jam, you need a set of gears. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> My fav was the Genicom line printer tho. We had several 4440s and they |
25 |
were blazingly fast. A case of paper was like pouring water out of a jug. |
26 |
o_O |
27 |
> |
28 |
|
29 |
Although some metal gears have given way to plastic stuffs, I can still |
30 |
vouch for their reliability. My office had one, and it's generally abused, |
31 |
yet it still chugs along merrily. |
32 |
|
33 |
Truly gave my boss a mid-life crisis: He's a champion of a two-letter brand, |
34 |
and his worldview came crashing to the ground when the Brother proved itself |
35 |
to be more reliable than his preferred brand ;-) |
36 |
|
37 |
Rgds, |