1 |
On Sunday 17 Jan 2016 13:10:42 Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 1:03 PM, J. Roeleveld <joost@××××××××.org> wrote: |
3 |
> > I would prefer a method that is independent of OS used. And provides |
4 |
> > server side limitations with regards to filesharing and clipboard access. |
5 |
> x2go is just X11, so it should be OS-independent as long as you have a |
6 |
> client/server for it. It just logs in as the appropriate user on the |
7 |
> remote host, so access beyond that is whatever you'd get if you just |
8 |
> logged in on a console. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Now, I can't vouch for how many OSes anybody has bothered to implement it |
11 |
> on. |
12 |
|
13 |
I am not sure what Grant's requirements are, but I would think that devs will |
14 |
require their own desktop environment and OS instance, rather than x2go's |
15 |
shared OS. Instead of a remote display presentation layer, how could one |
16 |
setup a fully virtualised desktop? |
17 |
|
18 |
-- |
19 |
Regards, |
20 |
Mick |