1 |
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 7:40 AM, <v_2e@×××.net> wrote: |
2 |
> Hello! |
3 |
> |
4 |
> On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 03:24:42 -0400 |
5 |
> Philip Webb <purslow@××××××××.net> wrote: |
6 |
> |
7 |
>> I plan to build a new machine in the next few months: |
8 |
>> it wb for regular desktop use, but performance is as important as |
9 |
>> price. |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> A quick look at what was available in April suggested |
12 |
>> an Intel Ivy Bridge i7 ( 22 nm ) ; Phoronix said it works with Kernel |
13 |
>> 3.2 |
14 |
>> + an Intel Z77 mobo (I usually buy ASUS) & that power/watt was |
15 |
>> excellent. |
16 |
>> |
17 |
> If you are considering to buy an Intel CPU, I'd recommend you to pay |
18 |
> some attention to such Intel' technologies as this one: |
19 |
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandy_Bridge#Intel_Insider_and_remote-control |
20 |
> because it doesn't looks like an advantage to the end user, but rather |
21 |
> as a security (or privacy) hole in one's system. |
22 |
|
23 |
We went through this on this list a couple months ago. |
24 |
|
25 |
That tech has been part of business-grade laptops and workstations for |
26 |
a while. It's intended as a tool for a corporate IT department, not |
27 |
the direct user of the machine. |
28 |
|
29 |
I'm not saying it's something I'd necessarily like to have on my |
30 |
personal devices, just that it's not exactly new. |
31 |
-- |
32 |
:wq |