1 |
On Friday 20 Jul 2012 13:13:41 Michael Mol wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 7:40 AM, <v_2e@×××.net> wrote: |
3 |
> > Hello! |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 03:24:42 -0400 |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > Philip Webb <purslow@××××××××.net> wrote: |
8 |
> >> I plan to build a new machine in the next few months: |
9 |
> >> it wb for regular desktop use, but performance is as important as |
10 |
> >> price. |
11 |
> >> |
12 |
> >> A quick look at what was available in April suggested |
13 |
> >> an Intel Ivy Bridge i7 ( 22 nm ) ; Phoronix said it works with Kernel |
14 |
> >> 3.2 |
15 |
> >> + an Intel Z77 mobo (I usually buy ASUS) & that power/watt was |
16 |
> >> excellent. |
17 |
> >> |
18 |
> > If you are considering to buy an Intel CPU, I'd recommend you to pay |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> > some attention to such Intel' technologies as this one: |
21 |
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandy_Bridge#Intel_Insider_and_remote-contr |
22 |
> > ol because it doesn't looks like an advantage to the end user, but rather |
23 |
> > as a security (or privacy) hole in one's system. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> We went through this on this list a couple months ago. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> That tech has been part of business-grade laptops and workstations for |
28 |
> a while. It's intended as a tool for a corporate IT department, not |
29 |
> the direct user of the machine. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> I'm not saying it's something I'd necessarily like to have on my |
32 |
> personal devices, just that it's not exactly new. |
33 |
|
34 |
I didn't know my laptop came with this <aheam> 'Intel rootkit' feature until I |
35 |
posted here a few weeks ago. I haven't done any research on this, but found |
36 |
these spooky pages: |
37 |
|
38 |
http://communities.intel.com/community/vproexpert/blog/2012/01/19/configuring- |
39 |
intel-vpro-with-linux-in-user-control-mode |
40 |
|
41 |
http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/download-the-latest-intel-amt-open- |
42 |
source-drivers/ |
43 |
|
44 |
I'm not sure how vulnerable my machine may be as supplied by Dell - I assume |
45 |
that unless the system is enabled first no out-of-band attempts will work. |
46 |
-- |
47 |
Regards, |
48 |
Mick |